• About Kim
  • About Kim’s Books

Kim Rendfeld

~ Outtakes of a Historical Novelist

Kim Rendfeld

Tag Archives: De rerum natura

Rediscovering a Roman Poet – and Atom Theory – Centuries Later

07 Tuesday May 2013

Posted by Kim Rendfeld in History, History of Science

≈ 24 Comments

Tags

Atom Theory, Atoms, De rerum natura, Lucretius, Poggio Bracciolini, Renaissance

Here is the latest installment on the history of atom theory by physics professor (and my dad) Dean Zollman, and we are now at the cusp of the Renaissance, where political intrigue has left an unemployed former Vatican official searching for a good book to copy and sell to wealthy patrons. – Kim

By Dean Zollman

Dean ZollmanIn the previous post I mentioned that some of the classical Greek works were preserved by “passing through” the Middle East. Because of strong scholarship in the Middle East while Europe was in the Dark Ages, these documents were translated into Arabic and later back into Latin. Some of the classical Greek and Roman intellectual works took another route. They lay dormant for centuries, usually in monastery libraries. Then, they were discovered by individuals who made an effort to find these materials. Roman poet Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura), which includes description of atoms, was one such document.

Prior to the middle of the 15th century, documents were reproduced by individuals making one copy at a time. Much of this copying was done by monks, presumably because with no worldly temptations they had a lot of time available. Thus, only a limited number of any written work would be available. The number of documents was also limited by the lifetime and availability of the material on which books were written.

Parchment and papyrus could last only a few hundred years. Further, they were relatively rare, so sometimes a copyist would scrape ink off one manuscript because he or she wanted to reuse the parchment. If these were not sufficient destructions, insects and worms saw books as lunch. With all of this, it is amazing that any of the Greek and Roman manuscripts survived at all.

Poggio

Poggio as depicted by Alfred Gudeman in the 1911 book Imagines Philogorum.

But they did. By the end of the 14th century book hunters were looking through libraries attempting to find classical works of philosophy and science. In the next few paragraphs I will briefly tell the story of Poggio Bracciolini, the man who rediscovered and disseminated Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things. (Books have been written about Poggio, so this is description is very incomplete.)

Poggio’s family had rather modest means. So, when he entered adulthood and wished to move into the professional world, he needed something to get him started. That something was his handwriting. Because everything was copied by hand, a person with outstanding skills at writing was a valuable resource, one that could earn good money in Florence at the end of the 14th century. Poggio used his talents and the money he earned from them to become trained as a notary. Thus, he came to know influential and wealthy Florentines such as Niccolo Niccoli who had a strong interest in all things Greek and Roman and who will play a role later in this story.

A sample of Poggio's handwriting.

A sample of Poggio’s handwriting.

In 1403, Poggio decided to move to Rome where he joined the staff of the pope. The Vatican at this time was not a pleasant work environment. Poggio wrote a collection of stories that reflect some of what he heard about the activities of the pope’s staff in a book called Facetiae. Because this blog is family-friendly, I cannot include any of the stories here. In spite of the atmosphere in Rome, Poggio flourished and eventually rose to the rank of apostolic secretary, essentially the pope’s personal secretary.

In 1410, Poggio’s new boss, Baldassare Cossa, was elected pope and took the name John XXIII. However, others also claimed to be the pope. In 1414 a meeting was convened in Constance, Germany, to resolve the conflicting claims to the papacy. The end result was that John XXIII was disposed and imprisoned. His name was stricken from the official register of popes so that more than five centuries later another man, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, could again choose the name John XXIII.

De rerum natura manuscript

De rerum natura copied by Girolamo di Matteo de Tauris for Pope Sixtus IV, Italy, 1483.

Poggio, thus, found himself in Germany and unemployed. So, he began searching the monasteries in the area for ancient books. In January 1417, Poggio entered a monastic library. He did not record its location, but historians think that it was in Fulda, Germany. There, he found a copy of Lucretius’s poem. Apparently, he was not allowed to remove the manuscript from the library.

Instead, he hired someone to make a copy for him. Poggio sent that copy to his longtime friend Niccolo Niccoli in Florence. Niccoli had copies made and kept them.  For a long time he did not return any version to Poggio. After 12 years, he finally sent a copy to Poggio and made copies available to others. Lucretius’ explanation of atoms and the philosophy of Epicurus were once again in circulation.
Over 50 copies from the 15th century still exist, so a large number must have been made. Shortly thereafter Gutenberg entered the scene and many more (printed) copies went into circulation.

How important this discovery and dissemination was to the development of ideas about matter is not completely clear. In his award-winning book The Swerve: How the World Became Modern Stephen Greenblatt makes a case for Poggio’s discovery being the real beginning of the Renaissance. Others have, however, disputed this claim. (See for example, “Why Stephen Greenblatt is Wrong — and Why It Matters” by Jim Hinch or “The Swerve by Stephen Greenblatt: A flawed but dazzling study of the origins of the Renaissance” by Colin Burrow.) Independent of how important Poggio’s work was to the intellectual development of Europe, without people such as he who meticulously scoured through libraries and copied old manuscripts, we would not likely have access today to many of the works of ancient thinkers.

With the Renaissance comes a more “modern” view of the scientific methods. Eventually those methods lead to a slow steady development of our ideas of atoms. In the next post we will start that story.

(All images are in the public domain via Wikiamedia Commons.)

Previously:

What Are Things Made of? Depends on When You Ask.

Ancient Greeks Were the First to Hypothesize Atoms

The Poetry of Atoms

Atom Theory in Ancient India

Religion, Science Clashed over Atoms

Medieval Arabic Scholarship Might Have Preserved Scientific Knowledge

Dean Zollman is university distinguished professor of physics at Kansas State University where he has been a faculty member for more than 40 years. During his career he has received three major awards—the National Science Foundation Director’s Award for Distinguished Teacher Scholars (2004), the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Doctoral University Professor of the Year (1996), and American Association of Physics Teachers’ Robert A. Millikan Medal (1995). His present research concentrates on the teaching and learning of physics and on science teacher preparation.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Poetry of Atoms

04 Friday Jan 2013

Posted by Kim Rendfeld in History, History of Science

≈ 28 Comments

Tags

Atom Theory, Atoms, De rerum natura, epic poetry, Lucretius, On the Nature of Things, Physics

It’s the first Friday of the month, which means another installment about the history of atom theory from physics professor and my dad, Dean Zollman. Here, atoms become the subject of Roman poetry. The theory might have gotten more traction if the poet had only stuck to science.—Kim

By Dean Zollman

Dean ZollmanTry this experiment at home. Find a small, bright beam of light. Sunlight coming through a small opening or the light from a video projector will do. Looking from the side of the beam, watch the motion of small particles of dust in the beam. You will see that the dust particles seem to bounce around in a somewhat random way. This motion indicates that the dust particles are colliding with invisible atoms in the air.

The effect was described by Robert Brown in 1827 and thus is called Brownian motion. The atomic explanation was presented by Albert Einstein in 1905. The discovery and explanation are considered critical events in establishing the existence of atoms.

Rewind the tape about 2,000 years. Lucretius, a Roman who died in about 55 BCE, wrote an epic poem, On the Nature of Things (De rerum natura). In this poem, Lucretius describes the science and philosophy of Epicurus, a Greek who lived about 200 years earlier.

The poem is divided into six books and is about 7,500 lines long.  Books 1 and 2 describe Epicurean concept of atoms.  Built on the ideas of Democritus, Epicurus added some features particularly about weight, density, and motion. He even connected the motion of atoms to free will.  Lucretius was a follower of Epicurus and wrote his epic poem in Latin to convince Romans of the value of this philosophy.

Book 2 contains the following:

There’s a model, you should realize,
A paradigm of this that’s dancing right before your eyes—
For look well when you let the sun peep in a shuttered room
Pouring forth the brilliance of its beams into the gloom,
And you’ll see myriads of motes all moving in many ways
Throughout the void and intermingling in the golden rays
…

Your attention to the motes that drift and tumble in the light:
Such turmoil means that there are secret motions, out of sight,
That lie concealed in matter. For you’ll see the motes careen
Off course, and then bounce back again, by means of blows unseen,
Drifting now in this direction, now that, on every side.
You may be sure this starts with atoms; they are what provide
The base of this unrest. For atoms are moving on their own,
Then small formations of them, nearest them in scale, are thrown
Into agitation by unseen atomic blows,

 From Lucretius: The Nature of Things translation by A. E. Stallings, Penguin Classics, 2007.

This short passage could have been a summary of Einstein’s ideas about the origin of Brownian motion. But it was written 2,000 years too early.

De rerum natura manuscript

De rerum natura copied by Girolamo di Matteo de Tauris for Pope Sixtus IV, Italy, 1483 (public domain image via Wikimedia Commons).

On the Nature of Things contains descriptions of atoms, their motion, and how they combine. Some by today’s standards are naïve; others like the Brownian motion are rather good.

However Epicureanism was not just science: it was also philosophy. That philosophy included components that did not sit well with many people. For example, the soul died with the body, and gods did not intervene in the affairs of humans.  A small issue was that pleasure from sex was considered “unnecessary.”

As a result, 400 years after Lucretius died St. Jerome attempt to discredit him by claiming that he became insane after drinking a love potion and committed suicide. This story was propagated by Tennyson in a poem titled Lucretius. No evidence exists to support St. Jerome’s claim.

Perhaps if Epicurus had held different views of religion and sex, progress on humankind’s understanding of atoms and molecules would have moved much more quickly.  Then the nuns at the Abbey of Saint Stephen in The Cross and the Dragon might have had molecular based medicine instead of herbs and prayers to help them nurse Hruodland back to health.

During a recent trip to India, I was reminded of the models of atom developed by Hindu philosophers at the same time as the Greek models were developed.  More on that next time.

Previously

What Are Things Made of? Depends on When You Ask.

Ancient Greeks Were the First to Hypothesize Atoms

Dean Zollman is university distinguished professor of physics at Kansas State University where he has been a faculty member for more than 40 years. During his career, he has received three major awards—the National Science Foundation Director’s Award for Distinguished Teacher Scholars (2004), the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Doctoral University Professor of the Year (1996), and American Association of Physics Teachers’ Robert A. Millikan Medal (1995). His present research concentrates on the teaching and learning of physics and on science teacher preparation.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

About Me

I write fiction set in early medieval times, an intersection of faith, family, and power. My latest release is Queen of the Darkest Hour, in which Fastrada must stop a conspiracy before it shatters the realm. For more about me and my fiction, visit kimrendfeld.com or contact me at kim [at] kimrendfeld [dot] com.

Queen of the Darkest Hour

Queen of the Darkest Hour

Short Story: Betrothed to the Red Dragon

Betrothed to the Red Dragon

The Ashes of Heaven’s Pillar

The Ashes of Heaven's Pillar

The Cross and Dragon

The Cross and the Dragon

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by e-mail.

Join 365 other followers

Social

  • View authorkimrendfeld’s profile on Facebook
  • View @kimrendfeld’s profile on Twitter

Kim’s posts

  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011

RSS Feed

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

Copyright

Copyright for the content on this blog belongs to its creators. For permission to reproduce, contact kim [at] kimrendfeld [dot] com.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: